Create your free account now! Sign up

Re: Deficit Cut in Half Under Obama


The exact transcript is at the begining of my post, no words were added.

October 22nd, 2012, the third presidential debate between Obama and Mitt Romney. 

ROMNEY:  You and I agreed, I believe, that there should have been a Status of Forces Agreement.

OBAMA:  That's not true!

ROMNEY:  Oh, you didn't?  You didn't want a Status of Forces Agreement?

OBAMA:  No.  What I -- what I would not have done is left 10,000 troops in Iraq that would tie us down!
Then this little tidbit came out today.

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-team-wanted-us-iraq-panetta-054024152.html

Washington (AFP) - Former Pentagon chief Leon Panetta has denounced the White House in a new memoir, accusing President Barack Obama's top aides of undercutting efforts to secure a deal in 2011 that could have kept US troops in Iraq.

 

Retaining a small US force would have helped contain sectarian violence and prevented the conditions that helped open the door to the onslaught of the Islamic State group, which has seized a large area of Iraq in recent months, Panetta argues in a soon-to-be released book, "Worthy Fights."

In the fall of 2011, "it was clear to me -- and many others -- that withdrawing all our forces would endanger the fragile stability then barely holding Iraq together," Panetta wrote in an adapted excerpt published in Time magazine Thursday.

 

"Privately, the various leadership factions in Iraq all confided that they wanted some US forces to remain as a bulwark against sectarian violence," he wrote.

While Defense and State Department officials tried to broker an agreement with the Baghdad leadership, the White House took a back seat and showed little determination to make the deal happen, Panetta said.

The US government had "leverage" but chose not to use it, he wrote.

"We could, for instance, have threatened to withdraw reconstruction aid to Iraq" if the then prime minister, Nuri al-Maliki, failed to support a continued US presence, he said.

The undersecretary of defense for policy, Michele Flournoy, the number three-ranking civilian at the Pentagon, pressed the argument with the full backing of the top brass, including the chiefs of all the armed forces, he said.

"But the President’s team at the White House pushed back, and the differences occasionally became heated.

"Flournoy argued our case, and those on our side viewed the White House as so eager to rid itself of Iraq that it was willing to withdraw rather than lock in arrangements that would preserve our influence and interests," he wrote.

I say again that EL Presidente' never wanted to keep troops in Iraq.

If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking.
This is CABL.com posting #363920. Tiny Link: cabl.co/mbGPQ
Posted in reply to: Re: Deficit Cut in Half Under Obama by Trey9007
There is 1 reply to this message
Re: Deficit Cut in Half Under Obama Trey9007 10/3/2014 11:34:51 AM