you are bringing up all the same points i brought up.
the return argument is 1 of 3 or all 3.
this reform is a socialist takeover....
what this reform does is take some control out of the insurance companies' hands. they have been fucking the whole nation over for years, yet this proven line of butt fucking is preferable to these people over the slightest help from the government. it keeps the average person from robbing the medical facilties and professionals because they choose to gamble with their health. however, with real gambling the gambler loses, with health gambling the medical field pays and people who can afford pick up the higher costs. how is this not a free ride for so many people out there? how is this not taking advantage of the system?
this reform will go to shit because the national government cant do anything right...
i challenge anyone out there to govern 500 million people in so many different ways and come even close to how our government does. this is like the file clerk employee second guessing the ceo of the biggest corporation in the world. what makes you think for a second that some corporation with a profit margin and a bottom line will ever choose the american people over the stockholders?
more people will quit jobs to get free insurance....
the people who dont work already have free insurance. the people who work are the ones struggling and there's a lot of people out there who are completely against giving them a hand. welfare reform is how you address this issue, not attacking a potential and very needed health care reform.
at some point we have to wake up and realize healthcare is a real issue that requires real strategy and implication. talking about encouraging competition across state may be a step in the right direction but it is far from a solid solution.
Re: not a put down
There is 1 reply to this message
