Forget my previous posting, Mr White. I have sent an e-mail and am attempting to retrieve my resume from an uncooperative MS WORD as you read this. It will be on its way shortly. Perhaps, this may be the beginning of something good! We'll see. Petergunn
>Mr. White, I am interested, but what level of Tech are you seeking and what type of company are you? I would consider an in-house position with a contractor, not with a cable service provider. I am a Splicer/Sweep Tech with twenty years experience, which includes, but not limited to
>locating, mappping, designing, permitting, financing and building nine small cable systems of my own. Two of which I kept for myself. I have built cable from the towers, dishes, and head-ends to the back of the converters on top of the televisions. Today my primary interests are with Sweep and Certifications, with an interest in CLI testing. Not that I necessarily am committed to this particular side of the business but that is where the money has been most lucrative for me. Last year I averaged twelve thousand dollars per month and spent three of those months on an island on the Pacific Rim. If there is contract sweep available with the position you are attempting to fill and I can continue to make the money my experience affords me then I want to forward a resume to you. By the way, I was in-house last year and had a remarkable year, nevertherless. Should we talk further down the road? click on my name for my number. Thanx, Petergunn
>>Inhouse tech. needed in Amelia OH. send resume's to (-REDACTED-)
>
TO: R. White FROM: T. Petersen
Member #: 8711
Registered: 1996-2001
Posted:
363
Name:
Tim Petersen
Name:
Tim Petersen
Company:
Performance Profiling
Occupation:
Sweep & Splice Technician
Location:
Where the Iowa River meets the Mississippi River
Personal:
mid 60s
Experience:
~40 years
Where there are no alternatives, there is no problem...Petergunn Lookstwice-2001.
This is CABL.com posting #57101. Tiny Link: cabl.co/mo09
Posted in reply to: Re:Inhouse Tech needed by Petergunn
There are 0 replies to this message