Create your free account now! Sign up

Re: So Why No Gov Bailout?


Kind of like GM and Chrysler. Accept the government stepped in to save them. Shafted the investors of GM, sold 49% of it to the UAW. Just plain sold off Chrysler to Fiat. So anyway why didn't Obama step in and bailout Hostess. GM had done pretty muchthe same thing as Hostess. It was in trouble due to missmanagement, was not reinvesting into the business.
I'll give you the answer the UAW was a big donor to the 2008 and 2012 Obama campaign, and the bakers union was not.
If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking.
This is CABL.com posting #350415. Tiny Link: cabl.co/mbDj1
Posted in reply to: Re: So Why No Gov Bailout? by dfwdtv
There are 5 replies to this message
Re: So Why No Gov Bailout? bushmaster 12/2/2012 11:41:15 AM
Re: So Why No Gov Bailout? dfwdtv 11/19/2012 7:56:12 PM
Re: So Why No Gov Bailout? gococks 11/18/2012 4:56:19 AM
Re: So Why No Gov Bailout? gococks 11/18/2012 4:44:38 AM
Re: So Why No Gov Bailout? cablgirl313 11/17/2012 10:57:15 PM