Create your free account now! Sign up

Re: Contractor or Employee by add?

no if you were an employee they would be providing the truck. Its just an image thing they dont want you going to a customers house in your 1980 izuzu truck with a rust hole in the side of it. They been bustin my balls about my ride if I get any money im just gonna get it painted. And if you are a contractor you would need to supply your own tools that is part of it. And some pay for training and some dont. When I trained the techs usually bought me lunch .Everywhere you go they do things differently so training for a week even if you know things real well is just a precaution so you can learn their way of doing things and how to fill out their paperwork. I worked for a company that used a span hanger for drops and another didnt use them so its diffrent everywhere you go. I can tell you I looked into a job with Lockheed martin a major defense contractor and they wanted you to train for 2 weeks without pay. So I dont think that add denotes employee 
This is CABL.com posting #336137. Tiny Link: cabl.co/mbzBJ
Posted in reply to: Re: Contractor or Employee by add? by lashdawg
There are 2 replies to this message
Re: Contractor or Employee by add? cablemn86 12/2/2011 8:14:09 AM
Re: Contractor or Employee by add? timrlly 12/2/2011 1:01:36 AM