Create your free account now! Sign up

RE: MasTec

So I guess the whole argument can be summed up in one sentence "It is the sub contractors of MasTec who do not pay their technicians". So I guess by default this gives MasTec a black eye because they contracted with the wrong sub contractor group who was probably disingenuous in the first place; representing themselves as something they were not? Am I off base here?
This is CABL.com posting #318096. Tiny Link: cabl.co/mbuUK
Posted in reply to: RE: MasTec by EshoreJoe
There is 1 reply to this message
RE: MasTec EshoreJoe 12/13/2010 3:02:46 PM