You wrote: "well I have been saying that they want to tell us what we can eat and how high or low the temp in our house can be. Here is one step closer to that. They have already controlled what students can have in school. Little steps. More to come. Sorry Trey, no exact time. I know that means it isn't true in your eyes. That guy in Alaska didn't think bears were dangerous either till he was killed and eaten by one."
And the followong: "U.S. regulators are planning a push to gradually cut the amount of salt Americans consume, saying less sodium would reduce deaths from hypertension and heart disease, The Washington Post reported on Tuesday.
The effort would eventually lead to the first legal limits on the amount of salt allowed in processed foods, the newspaper
reported. The plan is to be launched this year but officials have not set salt limits.
The government plans to work with the food industry and health experts to reduce sodium gradually over a period of years to ratchet down sodium consumption, the newspaper said, citing U.S. Food and Drug Administration sources.
U.S. researchers said in a recent study that working with the food industry to cut salt intake by nearly 10 percent could prevent hundreds of thousands of heart attacks and strokes over several decades and save the U.S. government $32 billion in healthcare costs.
Eating too much salt is a major cause of high blood pressure, which the Institute of Medicine, one of the National Academies of Sciences, last week declared a "neglected disease" that costs the U.S. health system $73 billion a year.
The FDA, which regulates most processed foods, and the U.S. Agriculture Department, which oversees meat and poultry, will work together on the effort to reduce Americans' sodium consumption.
Manufacturers can now use as much salt as they like in products but they are required to report the amount on nutrition labels.
Many food makers have already begun to cut salt content.
In March, PepsiCo Inc, which owns the Pepsi, Frito-Lay and Quaker brands, announced that it plans a reduction of 25 percent in the average sodium per serving in major global food brands in key markets by 2015."
From the above, the inference is that you are complaining they are one step closer to controlling us. Then you post an article (with no link by the way) about how US Regulators are planning to gradually cut the amount of salt Americans consume.
So, from your posting, one can deduce that: A. You don't like "THEY", and B. you found this article about salt consumption and decided to post this (with no link by the way) as an example of "THEY" wanting to control us. What you may have not realized is that this is a poor example of "THEY" contolling us. At this point in time food manufacturers are allowed to insert as much salt into there products as they desire. Salt is a contributing factor to high blood pressure. High blood pressure is a contributing factor to heart attack and stroke.
So, by "THEY" wanting food manufacturers to reduce salt content in their products has the potential to reduce high blood pressure, heart attacks, and strokes shows us that "THEY" may just want Americans to be a little healthier.
Re: another step to control
Member #: 10075
Registered: 1996-2001
Posted:
416
Name:
Dale
Occupation:
Project Manager/Sweep Technician
There is 1 reply to this message
