How is this any different than any trial in any courthouse in the US. Someone makes an accusation that is a violation of a law. In this case, the need to be a natural born citizen as mandated by the Constitution. You provide evidence to prove the allegations untrue. Why is this so difficult? Why is Obama above reproach? This will go away when he produces all of the evidence, that only he can provide, espescially now that he is president.
Obama himself can end this debate in its tracks and chooses not to. Show the long form and the passports he used to travel as a child and if they are what he says they are, this is over. If this accusation was made against a republican and there was any resistance in producing the proof that it is false, the media would have a cow. But because it is this fine upstanding individual, it is a race crime and all made up with only some of the proof and not the most important peice either, produced thus far.
Put up or shut up, real simple and entirely in Obama's control to do so. No one can do it for him. But it is another way to distract people from what he is doing and a ploy to say those people are nuts without actually proving them wrong. Only in America.
Re: Is Obama constitutionally eligible to serve?
Member #: 61931
Registered: 9/16/2008
Posted:
963
Occupation:
Tower Contractor
Location:
PA
Personal:
mid 50s
Experience:
~37 years
There is 1 reply to this message
