Re: Union Woes
Member #: 59897
Registered: 6/18/2008
Posted:
3
Name:
Wayne K. Hill
Name:
Wayne K. Hill
Company:
Allcom Services
Occupation:
Supervisor
Location:
Greenwood Delaware
UNION IS NOT THE ANSWER FOR CONTRACTORS BUT IN SOME INDUSTRIES IT DOES WORK IF THEY COULD JUST LET US WORKING GUYS MAKE A DECENT LIVING YOU HAVE COMPANIES OUT THERE PAYING MININMUM WAGE BUT THE CEO TAKES HONE 150 MILLION A YEAR WHAT HAPPENED TO TAKING CARED OF THE WORKING MAN WHO MAKES YOU THAT 150 MILL. A YR 50 YRS AGO YOU COULD GET A JOB WITH HEALTH CARE PROVIDEDAND RETIREMENT PLAN NOW DAYS YOU PAY FOR YOUR HEALTH CARE AND YOUR RETIREMEBT PLAN IS SOCIAL SECURITY (GOOD LUCK) BUT THE CEO GETS HIS EVEN IF THE COMPANY POSTS LOSSES OR GETS BAILED OUT BY THE GOVT. AND WE GETSCREWED YET AGAIN THEN INSTEAD OF HEING OUT THE LITTLE GUY WHO MAKES THE MONEY FOR EVERYONE THEY GIVE TAX CUTS TO BUSINESSES SO THEY CAN CONTINUE TO ENRICH THE FEW GUESS WHAT IM SAYING IS SOMEONE NEEDS TO TRY TO LEVEL THE FEILD SURE AINT GETTING HELP FROM BIG BROTHER SO I CAN UNDERSTAND WHY SOMEONE WOULD GO UNION IN HOPES OF BETTER BENEFITS IN HOPE OF HOPE IF NOTHING ELSE ALSO IN 1957 BUSINESSES PAID 60 PER CENT OF ALL TAXES CITIZENS PAID 12 PERCENT OF ALL TAXES NOW CITIZENS PAY 72 PERCENT BUSINESSES PAY 10 PERCENT LOOKS LIKE THE GOVERNMENT WORKS FOR BUSINESS WHO WORKS FOR ME REMEMBER IN THE 50S WAS THE HEY DAY OF UNIONS AND THE AMERICAN DREAM
This is CABL.com posting #242664. Tiny Link: cabl.co/mbbh6
Posted in reply to: Re: Union Woes by shaunz
There are 0 replies to this message