Cant you see where this going, nowhere. You just posted that in 2005 the courts ordered 23 million in restitution from unions. I posted that 1 company was ordered to 7.5 million, 1 company ordered to pay 1/3 of what all unions had to pay in 1 year. Are you sharing this info to make unions look better?
You keep brining the data but you dont make a point. You seem to be saying that all unions are bad because of the actions of a few, but you dont feel the same way about union avoidance counselors and companies who use them, even though they have had scandal also.
If this not what you are saying, what is?
Re: Union?
There is 1 reply to this message
