Create your free account now! Sign up

Re: Missing Weapons


After calling me a schoolyard bully and name-calling liar, your unintelligent discourse is now getting rather boring. Clinton was the only president to ever go after bin Laden. That is a fact. When he tried to get OBL in Afghanistan, the America-haters like yourself who blindly follow the Rush Limbaugh nutsos were demanding that Clinton pay for those cruise missiles himself because "he was only doing it to distract attention away from his affair"! Would we have gotten OBL then if our leaders weren't distracted by the haters?

Bush did nothing about terrorism before 9/11. His big initiative was (and still is) a costly missile defense system that would do nothing but line the pockets of defense contractors and escalate arms proliferation around the world. Bush was even against a Department of Homeland Security. Until he was for it. (rolleyes)

What if we didn't invade Iraq? You really don't have a clue, do you. Aside from the fact (and yes, it's a fact) that Iraq HAD NO CHEMICAL WEAPONS, anyone with a basic knowledge of the process can make their own sarin nerve agent in any kitchen right here in the USA using rather easily obtained raw materials.

Sure, had we not gone to war with Iraq, Saddam Hussein might still be there like he was for the 10 years prior, albeit under closer scrutiny after 9/11. But then again, Osama probably wouldn't be on TV looking healthy and tanned taunting us about the 3000 of our people that he killed either.


It's easy to define what you're willing to fight for; but what are you willing to stand for without fighting? What are you willing to lay down your life for?
This is CABL.com posting #137713. Tiny Link: cabl.co/mJZl
Posted in reply to: Re: Missing Weapons by scarecrow
There are 2 replies to this message
Re: Missing Weapons scarecrow 11/1/2004 6:10:00 PM
Re: Missing Weapons HDFATBOY 11/1/2004 12:08:00 PM