CABL Forum - Re: Const. QC (survey) Questions. Want feedback.

Well, Some people have had their say, now it's to the bottom line, not to say that everyone's comment is valid, for they are, it's just that the "cable provider" has the final say. It is in essence whether or not the deadlines are the top priority or the quality in conjunction with a realistic deadline are the top priority. If the "cable provider is more concerned with the deadline date then quality takes a back seat. One must determine the priority list of the "cable provider". Corporate Executives have little or no idea what it takes to put "it" up or to cut "it" hot, the only priority on their agenda is their income, they are gonna see from the work preformed. You'll have to hammer on the " cable provider" in order to ascertain the criteria on which you'll proceed. If not you'll get your ass burned.

> If you have an interest, I would be willing to share with you the features we programmed into our project management software program. In your message, you didn't identify from which perspectus you would be looking at QC, the operator side or the contractor side. Please feel free to reach me at 623 582-4240 daily. If I am out of town, leave a message and I will return your call.
>
> Alan
>
> > I am looking for feedback from construction project managers, walkout people, QC managers, QC technicians,etc. concerning any existing construction QC programs that anyone has used. What are you using? How well does it work for you? In your opinion, what does a good QC program need to do? If you can, send me a copy of your program. If that's not asking for too much.
> > Please send me your comments and ideas so I may include your feedback into building my QC program.
> > Please reply to e-mail address here.
> > Thanks for your help.
> > Mark Breithaupt
> > Breithaupt Enterprises Inc.

INSTALLATION

CONSTRUCTION / TECH

OFFICE / OTHER

Re: Const. QC (survey) Questions. Want feedback.