Create your free account now! Sign up

Re:GTS ARE THEY WORTH WORKING 4



Alive and kicking. Hope all is well in the Pope household.


>No shit man. Hey Craig, your still alive? Shayne.
>
>>
>>Why is it people have to hide behind screen names. Michelle you did a very fine job in VB. GTS is a good company, I myself was with them for a years as a project manager. Checks are on time and work is there as long as the systems have it to give.
>>If you want bash me now feel free, but please leave your name so we all can air your laundry. Craig Moran
>>
>>
>>>Your're 100% correct. GTS is a good company. But what in your vast expanse of CATV "experience", would you know to say "that's just cable t.v."? As I recall, you were hired as a temp to help out when the office manager had a baby and then moved away. Also, to correct you, it was LESS than two years ago. If you haven't figured it out, I was on that job too and you don't know squat about the contracting and business side of cable television. Do ya? Stick to making copies and answering the phones Meesh! Also, I think Mr. Martin may be a little too busy to call and chat don't you think? Have a nice day.
>>>
>>>>GTS was one of the best companies I have ever worked for. Yes, they have "moments", but that's the cable business! I really enjoyed working for everyone there, and yes, upper management in GA is overall a great group of people to deal with and work with their employess as much as they possibly can. I was office manager for the VB location for two years and loved working with everyone i encountered there. I say take the job, and if you talk to Jon Martin tell him Michele would like to talk to him!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> SOMEONE HAS OFFERED US A POSITION UNDER THIS COMPANY. I HAVE ALREADY HEARD THE MANAGEMENT IS QUESTIONABLE. IS THIS THE TRUTH?? ARE THEY A GOOD COMPANY TO WORK FOR??????
>>>>> I'M NOT LOOKING TO BE SCREWWWWED ANY-MORE..
>>
>>
This is CABL.com posting #48215. Tiny Link: cabl.co/mmHP
Posted in reply to: Re:GTS ARE THEY WORTH WORKING 4 by Casper
There are 0 replies to this message