Create your free account now! Sign up

Re: obama


Ok I just heard you guys bring up 2006.

You do know the president has very little control overall.  All he does is
sign billis into laws and makes suggestions of what he would like to see.
It is up to the congress to come up with the bills.

There is nothing more dangerous in the country than a democratic house senate and president.  The reverse is aslo true. (Republican house senate and preisdent)

If you have a house and senate different from the president then there will
always be a clash.  Like in 2006. Republican President with a democratic senate and house.  Then when OBAMA got elected it was a free for all for him.
Democratic president demoractic house and democratic senate.

These are facts.

The other thing was OBAMA could have cared less about ACA.  He only
ran with it because clinton was running on it against him.

Depending on what happends in the next couple days will depend if obama can do more or if he will be gridlocked.

When you look at all the problems you have to look at them as a whole.
Who has the house, senate and presidency.
without those 3 known facts, you are just playing the blame game.
This is CABL.com posting #364440. Tiny Link: cabl.co/mbGYe
Posted in reply to: Re: obama by danimal
There is 1 reply to this message
Re: obama danimal 11/3/2014 6:04:54 AM