I honestly want you or anyone else who wants to contribute on this to really help me understand. Heres what I see/saw.
When the U3 number was bad, you guys accept the legitimicy of the data.
When the U3 number got better, you guys disputed the legitimicy of the U3 nummber and pointed to the U6.
When the U6 was up you guys accepted the legitimicy of the data.
When the U6 began to decline, you guys disputed the legitimicy of the data and told us to look at the GDP..
When the GDP is down, you accept legitimicy of the data.
When the GDP is up, you dispute the legitimicy of the data data.
When CLinton was POTUS, you guys tell us the GOP House gets the credit for the fiscal health during his presidency, because the House is responsible for the purse strings.
While Obama is POTUS only he was to blame for the large deficits early in his first terms.
I mean the list goes on and on to show how the Right seems to pick and choose when anything is legit.
All I ask is, for anyone to show me anything that has been calculated or done different under Obama, compared to past POTUS's.
Re: Q2 GDP revised up to 4.6 percent
There are 2 replies to this message
