I can suggest that the moon is made of cheese, that does not make it so.
And by your report, they were aiding Libya to supply 'Libyan' arms to Syrian Rebels. If and I stress 'if' it is true, then by that report, Libya was in charge and in possession of its missiles, CIA may have been assisting them, but according to what you just posted, I don't see anything saying "US Missiles stolen" only, Libya missiles, or did I read that wrong?
"annex near the consulate [working] on a project to supply missiles from Libyan armories to Syrian Rebels."
And, since you quoted the blaze, I just looked it up, and his story has changed already Editor’s note: This story has been updated for clarity, and to note that DiGenova is uncertain whether the weapons were at the CIA annex on the night of the September 11 attack.
So, to start, 400 missles stolen from the consulate during the attack, now its 400 stolen from an annex near the consulate during the attack, now, no one knows exactly when (or if) they were stolen. Yea, seems pretty solid to me
