I guess that means ANY historical document written ANY later than that which can be attested to by a living witness is not reliable according to Mark. Notice how once AGAIN he has nothing to support such a claim other than his own thought on the matter. That being the case you may as well throw out any writings by Plato, Homer, oh and don't forget to discount archaeological finds that support biblical accounts. Let's just all pretend none of it never happened. Wonder what is so grievous about God's Word that would cause such a reaction? Something must really strike a nerve when one does not believe in something, yet puts so much effort in trying to argue it's existence. I wonder if he sits down at the mall, with a sign at Christmas, protesting not only the fact that Santa Claus doesn't exist, but the very existence of Jesus? How does one claim to believe in God and Jesus, by stating he believes what is written in the Apostle's Creed, yet deny the Word of God, which is the ONLY way he would have any knowledge of either? What source would bring one to such a knowledge? Then have the nerve to come to this forum and deny the credibility of God's Word. Absolutely mind boggeling! You would think that he would at least post something giving some kind of credibility to his statements, yet there never has been anything outside what is in his head, and that is a scary thought. If you're going to bash something, at least back it up with some kind of credibility.
Re: Fulfilled Prophecy
There are 0 replies to this message