Create your free account now! Sign up

Re: Why Obama is not first 'imposter'


That's the whole problem with the left. They keep stating it has something to do with the fact Obama considers himself black. They always want to digress from the fact that this fraud refuses to release his long form Hawaiian birth certificate. Of course, he can't release it, because it doesn't exist. If it did exist, he would of already released it, instead of spending a couple of million dollars in legal battles to prevent its release. As they say, its a no brainer, and the public is catching on! Anyone else notice the momentum growing with the masses, as more and more are finally looking into the matter, instead of depending on whatever BS CNN, MSNBC and the like feed them, in their campaign to conceal, distort, fabricate, and lie ... all followed up by ridiculing the truth and those who seek it.

For the writer of the article to compare the thoughts on the eligibility of president Obama, (who's first executive order in office, btw, was to seal his records), to the post election discomfort a few citizens had to various issues with prior presidential election winners, is like comparing the RMS Titanic to a row boat!
This is CABL.com posting #309798. Tiny Link: cabl.co/mbsKU
Posted in reply to: Why Obama is not first 'imposter' by sweatforhire
There is 1 reply to this message
Re: Why Obama is not first 'imposter' Nat Light 8/10/2010 7:47:01 AM