CABL Forum - Re: Hawaii elections clerk: Obama not born here

Here are some more truths for you sweat ... if you really care about the truth. You're a smart guy .... it's time you learned and excepted the truth!!!

Anyone interested, should also read the actual full article in the link below. It clearly states the reason behind the lies told by factcheck.org. As it is just another site claiming to be an unbiased truth teller, when nothing could be further from the truth. It is described in the first couple of paragraphs in the article in the link, but I left that part out of this post in order to keep the post shorter.

http://ngoldfarb.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/state-of-hawaii-says-obama-birth-certificate-not-valid/

"...Hawaii’s official birth certificate is the “Certificate of Live Birth” which is different from the “Certification of Live Birth”. Changing the “e” to “ion” is all the difference in the world. Obama and factcheck.org only publish the “ion” version, which is merely a computer printout, and not a birth certificate. How else are they different? Read and weep.
Annenberg’s factcheck.org continues to publish, even today, Obama “Certification of Live Birth,” and Annenberg claims falsely that this proves Obama was born in the USA.
Annenberg’s corrupt factcheck,org published thousands of words about this but never once says that their document id is the “ion” version, not the genuine “e” version. The most tragically comic statements on the corrupt factcheck.org is they quote people who “have seen” the “e” version.
Golly, Molly, if people “have seen” it, why won’t Obama produce it?
Only one answer: it doesn’t exist. You would think by now, after he has been President so long, the FBI could have cooked up a good forgery for him? Don’t worry, eventually some liberal progressive totalitarian creep will forge one, but the fact that they went so long without producing it proves that no valid birth certificatE ever existed or they would have produced it.
Here is what the State of Hawaii’s official government websites publish about the matter:
QUOTE: “The Certification of Live Birth is a legal document, but it is TOTALLY INADEQUATE when it comes to proving an individual was born in Hawaii.
The State of Hawaii DOES NOT EVEN ACCEPT the Certification of Live Birth as valid proof that an individual was born in Hawaii.
The Hawaii Department of Homelands, which administers programs to encourage property ownership for native Hawaiians states the following on its website.
“In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found ONLY on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth(a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.“ [Emphasis Mine].
The bottom line is that the Certification of Live Birth can be erroneous. It has been reported that it was not uncommon for foreigners residing in Hawaii to bring their infant children to the Clerk of the Court, swear they were born in Hawaii and have actual Certificates of Live Birth issued to their children.
It has even been reported that foreigners residing in Hawaii, in some cases, produced birth certificates from foreign countries and the State of Hawaii still issued Hawaiian Certificates of Live Birth to the infants in question."

INSTALLATION

CONSTRUCTION / TECH

OFFICE / OTHER

Re: Hawaii elections clerk: Obama not born here