Again, you dig your hole even deeper.
Jan 2009, there 11.3 million unemployed. Now you want to switch the debate to workers classified as full time. I can only assume you want to make the argument that, of the 11.3 million unemployed in Jan 2009, you want to say 6.5 million of them were full-timers. Without even researching this, I can point a big hole in your theory. Some how you want to say only 6.5M out of the 11M unemployed in Jan. 2009 are full timers. But under Obama, the entire 15.7 million people unemployed are full-timers. This is the only way you can make your crazy 126% claim stick, and is just as DUMB as the other BS you've posted.
You can continue digging your hole...
Re: Hmmm........
There is 1 reply to this message
