Create your free account now! Sign up

Re: Tea Party!

We can also look at this from another angle. Let's look at preponderance of evidence.

... Why should a birth announcement, that family members commonly post in newspapers, or that local papers provide as a community service, about births, etc. of relevance to the community, and that only state a date of birth, sex of baby (male), and last known address of parent(s), but state nothing about WHERE the child was born, have credence over newspaper headings and articles, researched by professional fact checkers (reporters), that clearly state WHERE Obama was born, and published at a point in time when they also had NO idea he would go on to run for, or become, president of the United States?



Does that really make any sense to people?

I digress to what another blogger stated, as he rightfully posted:

"...I soon realized that people don't really want to find problems that are inconvenient for them and many others are afraid to find any problems because they could become politically incorrect or "racist" in the eyes of the first group. These are circumstances in which the classic Emperor's new clothes may emerge in megalomanic proportions...."

http://motls.blogspot.com/2008/10/obama-natural-born-us-citizen.html
This is CABL.com posting #300091. Tiny Link: cabl.co/mbqel
Posted in reply to: Re: Tea Party! by drifterdawg
There are 0 replies to this message