Conservatism did not do that, progressivism did. Forget about what party he came from for a minute.To say so means you have to call Bush a conservative, which he is not. True conservatives don't spend like he did. That's a fact. Agreed?
Bush is about a 65 out of 100 on the political scale if you consider 100 to be a progressive totalitarian type, and 0 to be anarchist. That said The "O" is about an 80 on the scale. so if you want to point fingers, (at Bush) and believe in the left right paradigm, you are pointing at someone who is on the same political side as "O" and yourself except "O" is more extreme. If Bush would have been seen for what he turned out to be in the end, and he called himself a Democrat I would bet you would have voted for him and defended him as you do for "O". I would consider Reagan about a 45 and I would consider Washington to be about 40 by the way just for comparison sake. Clinton was probably about a 65 as well IMO. Hitler, Stalin et al. 95-100
These parties were created to keep us fighting amongst ourselves while they take all the money and control from us. Why do we need them? Can you or anybody answer that one? I say do away with the parties and just let people run on their own ideas.
If people want to be a socialist, statist, anarchist etc., that's fine, just as long as it is out in the open for all to see and not hide behind a party which is what to many do now and it has the public completely confused and why most people don't follow politics. It's just to damn confusing for most to see it for what it truly is, even for people who do follow politics apparently.
Re: No one denied health care. WTF--- goodsky
Member #: 22852
Registered: 4/7/2003
Posted:
739
Occupation:
Wiring stuff together
Personal:
early 50s
Experience:
~36 years
There are 0 replies to this message
