Create your free account now! Sign up

Re: Nature Has Destroyed The Great Lakes, Did I Sa

While the Great Lakes comprise 20 percent of the fresh water, it is not all contaminated. So to say that is false. They want to clean it up and maybe they need to. But there isn't anything saying how much is contaminated. If it were all contaminated they would not allow people to eat the fish that come out of there or drink the water. In the 70'a Lake Erie was all but dead and was cleaned up and life brought back to it. I also don't see the need to get rid of the carp in this money. Just let people take as many as they want. And man also changes the environment for the better not just the worse as you say. I have seen clean up efforts work in Alaska. But I don't see bigger government as being the answer. Then is what they want. The clean up efforts I have seen work were by volunteers not paid for by taxpayers with new jobs created by the government. Obama's "3 million jobs saved or created" are all government jobs. I think there is an issue with the government taking tax dollars for projects and then not using those dollars for those projects and hiding pet earmarks in there. And that is pulling the wool over our eyes. Man can change the environment for the better.
This is CABL.com posting #292897. Tiny Link: cabl.co/mbomj
Posted in reply to: Re: Nature Has Destroyed The Great Lakes, Did I Sa by sweatforhire
There are 0 replies to this message