Occupation:Your job title (sweep tech, installer, supervisor,
Location:asp
you know I have never seen someone defend someone so vehemently, except for they have a vested interest. I have looked at your profile and seen all the your postings to date. I further noticed that you joined the cable bar in Sept 09, and that YOUR DAD DOES AUDITS ALL OVER THE PLACE, therefore, I am going to take a wild guess and say the you have that somewhat vested interest in either IMT or UCS. Irregardless, let me say this I spoike with the person that had the contract in Kansas, with Cox and he explained that the reason that Tommy had not been paid, only had to do with chargebacks, nothing was ever said that there was a problem with his work. Dude, as someone who knows the law, let me say this unless you want some of what UCS and IMT are getting, my suggestions is that you shut up until you have proof to back up what you say or you might get that defamation lawsuit that you are wanting.
This is CABL.com posting #285040. Tiny Link: cabl.co/mbmjA