Create your free account now! Sign up

Really?


American neoconservatives have often used the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to bolster their case for aggressive action against Iran. So the assumption might be that they would be rooting for Iranians to take care of the problem themselves by electing reformer Mir Hossein Mousavi in today's vote..

Instead, they're rooting for the anti-American bogeyman to stay in power.

Middle East Forum Director Daniel Pipes said in a speech at the Heritage Foundation that he would vote for Ahmadinejad if he could:

American Enterprise Institute's Michael Rubin told National Review's Kathryn Jean Lopez it might be better for Ahmadinejad to win, because a loss might give Obama the impression that diplomacy was working.
This is CABL.com posting #257288. Tiny Link: cabl.co/mbe5Y
There are 2 replies to this message
Re: Really? JD42596 6/13/2009 8:46:27 PM
Re: Really? Gwester843 6/13/2009 12:22:00 PM