Create your free account now! Sign up

Re: yep


where did I mention GWB? And it only takes one to look at information other than CNN and msnbc. You seem to be the one who is fixated on a non-existant infatuation with Bush on my part. Quite the opposite. And as far as rants go you seem to do a pretty good job of it yourself.
I have provided much information is the past. Do I have the exact place I got the "you're being handed the torch...." remark. No I have forgotten where I got it as it has been some time and I am not a computer or Spock. But I do have a good enough memory to know when I am saying something here it came from a reputable source as a rule. So your post is the one that seems to be filled with holes as I have so often, given many sources. So when I don't give any, you feel it is your place to call me on it?
You are sooo right about being against the Damns. I am. They are leading this country into socialism and anyone with their blinders off and head out of the sand can see it so clearly. The media loves them and refuses to report the news if it might embarrass them. Sorry you can't see that. There are many who can.
Conspiracy? Call it what you want. They are not on your side or mine. You working for a living? You want your money going to the government? Having them tell you what to do with it? Giving it to people who refuse to work? Giving tax credit to people who don't pay taxes? Creating more debt in the first 3 months than Bush did in 8 years?
http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/  (a source for you since you can't find one for yourself) I can find more if you like. But that is the socialist nature, to let others do the work for them. Are you socialist?

Thanks for the compliment among all your diatribe and since you noticed I paid attention in English, is it possible I pay attention elsewhere? Wait, I will answer for as the question was rhetorical, YES.
This is CABL.com posting #249442. Tiny Link: cabl.co/mbc3q
Posted in reply to: Re: yep by Bean Dip
There are 0 replies to this message